Piercing License: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<html><div class="mw-content-ltr" dir="ltr" id="mw-content-text" lang="en"><p>Some <a class="mw-redirect" href="/index.php?title=Piercers" title="Piercers">piercers</a> claim to be licensed in one way or another. This is at best 50% true. There is <i>no</i> central body qualified or legally able to offer licensing to piercers or <a class="mw-redirect" href="/index.php?title=Tattoo_artists" title="Tattoo artists">tattoo artists</a>. Thus, there is no <b>piercing license<...") |
(Page conversion via llm-mediawiki-rev -jwm) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some [[Piercers|piercers]] claim to be licensed in one way or another. This is at best 50% true. There is ''no'' central body qualified or legally able to offer licensing to piercers or [[Tattoo artists|tattoo artists]]. Thus, there is no '''piercing license'''. | |||
In some states, the state does license piercers, but this is largely a health board license which ensures that studios adhere to a set of rules governing use of an [[Autoclave|autoclave]], [[Sterile|sterile]] procedures, etc. It does not guarantee in any way that the [[Practitioner|practitioner]] is technically qualified to perform [[Piercings|piercings]] or [[Tattoos|tattoos]]. | |||
Latest revision as of 09:44, 17 September 2023
Some piercers claim to be licensed in one way or another. This is at best 50% true. There is no central body qualified or legally able to offer licensing to piercers or tattoo artists. Thus, there is no piercing license.
In some states, the state does license piercers, but this is largely a health board license which ensures that studios adhere to a set of rules governing use of an autoclave, sterile procedures, etc. It does not guarantee in any way that the practitioner is technically qualified to perform piercings or tattoos.