Cover Up and Mod Before Client: Difference between pages

From BME Encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Page conversion via llm-mediawiki-rev -jwm)
 
(Page conversion via llm-mediawiki-rev -jwm)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Faced with a tattoo you don't want, you have two main options (other than "deal with it") for the problem. [[Tattoo removal]] is of course one option, but it's extremely expensive, painful, and often leaves a scar, so many people choose to do a cover up.
'''Mod Before Client''' refers to the client's safety '''always''' coming before the coolness factor. It is an unfortunate phenomena in the younger generation of "cutters" to put a greater emphasis on the modification than the needs of the client.


A cover up may take the form of '''reworking''' which is basically going over the same tattoo in an attempt to clean it up — making the outlines crisper and bolder, refreshing the colours, and so on. If the original tattoo artwork is acceptable but poorly applied, this is usually the best option.
For example, a mentally unstable client approaches a practitioner and requests an unsafe procedure. A practitioner that is responsible will talk the client out of the procedure (and refuse to do it, no matter what), whereas a "mod before client" practitioner will be excited enough about doing a "cool mod" to overlook the bigger problems, often even talking them into a bigger and more dangerous procedure.


In the case of a true (and total) cover up, the artist uses a larger and darker design to "cover" the existing tattoo. '''GREAT''' care should be exercised in choosing an artist to do the coverup, as you don't want to make it '''WORSE'''!
The first thing a quality practitioner will do is tell you whether your procedure is safe or not (you can look up the risks yourself here on BME/Risks). If a practitioner doesn't drill these risks into you, it means either they don't know them, or they don't want to bother telling you. They're not people who you want working on you.


In the past, cover ups were often rather crude. [[Black Panther|Black Panthers]], [[Tribal|tribal tattoo]] designs and 8-balls were your best option. These days, inventive tattooists who utilize a balanced sense of light and shading can cover most tattoos so nicely that the man on the street would never have known anything else was ever there.
If your procedure is risky (example, implants on top of a forearm), the practitioner should explain to you why the procedure can't be safely done, and discuss your alternatives with you. Only the worst, most dangerous hacks will do a procedure that isn't safe "because the customer insisted." They will either work with you to develop a safe alternative, or not do the procedure at all.


[[White Ink|White ink]] is sometimes used to lighten the old tattoo in preparation for cover up, and others will partially remove a tattoo before covering it up (since tattoo removal often takes several sessions, slowly lightening the piece).
In the course of discussing all this with you, they will be listening to what you're saying, and assessing whether you understand the implications of the procedure and are ready for it. If they don't think you are ready, they will — and SHOULD — tell you either that they won't do it, or that you come back later.


{| class="center"
== Entries related to this risk ==
|-
* [[Implant|Implant]]
| [[File:Cover_Up-1.jpg|thumb|Cover Up]]  
* [[Subincision|Subincision]]
| [[File:Cover_Up-2.jpg|thumb|Cover Up]]  
* [[Tongue Splitting|Tongue Splitting]]
| [[File:Cover_Up-3.jpg|thumb|Cover Up]]
|}
 
==See Also==
* [[Tattoo Touch-Up]]
* [[Tattoo Blow-Out]]

Latest revision as of 08:10, 17 September 2023

Mod Before Client refers to the client's safety always coming before the coolness factor. It is an unfortunate phenomena in the younger generation of "cutters" to put a greater emphasis on the modification than the needs of the client.

For example, a mentally unstable client approaches a practitioner and requests an unsafe procedure. A practitioner that is responsible will talk the client out of the procedure (and refuse to do it, no matter what), whereas a "mod before client" practitioner will be excited enough about doing a "cool mod" to overlook the bigger problems, often even talking them into a bigger and more dangerous procedure.

The first thing a quality practitioner will do is tell you whether your procedure is safe or not (you can look up the risks yourself here on BME/Risks). If a practitioner doesn't drill these risks into you, it means either they don't know them, or they don't want to bother telling you. They're not people who you want working on you.

If your procedure is risky (example, implants on top of a forearm), the practitioner should explain to you why the procedure can't be safely done, and discuss your alternatives with you. Only the worst, most dangerous hacks will do a procedure that isn't safe "because the customer insisted." They will either work with you to develop a safe alternative, or not do the procedure at all.

In the course of discussing all this with you, they will be listening to what you're saying, and assessing whether you understand the implications of the procedure and are ready for it. If they don't think you are ready, they will — and SHOULD — tell you either that they won't do it, or that you come back later.

Entries related to this risk